| Shakespeare in Love |

Some films are like full-course meals, others like appetizers and still other like rich, calorie-laden desserts. Falling definitely in the latter category is the Miramax release SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE. A marvelously witty romantic comedy, the movie is akin to a key lime pie—rich and sumptuous with just the right amount of bite. And while the script has reportedly been kicking around for years (at one time Daniel Day-Lewis and Julia Roberts were reportedly set to star), like a fine wine, it has aged well. Writer Marc Norman reportedly got the germ of the idea for the film from his college student son who suggested to his father that the "missing" years in Shakespeare's life might yield something. Later Tom Stoppard, no slouch in offering "alternative" takes on the lives of famous people (in such plays as Arcadia, Rosencranz and Guildenstern Are Dead, and Travesites). Stoppard is a wizard of intermixing actual texts with his unique blend of ideas so the final script proves both amusing and solid. Although set in 1593, the film has a very contemporary sensibility and the in-jokes and quotes from the Bard's canon fly by. The premise is an intriguing one: what if William Shakespeare, an actor of note and rising author, were commissioned to write a play (Romeo and Ethel, the Pirate's Daughter) and he found he was suffering from writer's block? From there the fun begins. Stoppard and Norman's script is clever enough to interweave characters and half-formed ideas that would later show up in Shakespeare's plays. For example, he utilizes the services of an apothecary who resembles Shylock and who dispenses advice like a 16th-century Sigmund Freud. The plot is Shakespearean in its own way. The blocked writer meets his muse in Viola de Lesseps (whom the screenwriters peg as the mysterious "Dark Lady of the Sonnets"), who by twist of fate was betrothed to the impoverished Earl of Wessex in an agreement that had the blessing of no less than Queen Elizabeth herself. As the playwright begins to woo Viola, the play begins to take form. Viola harbors a desire to act so in a reversal of the conventions of the day when young boys undertook the female roles, she pretends to be a boy. It is all great fun and under the assured hand of director John Madden (who last year brought us MRS. BROWN), the film soars. The cast is impeccable. A nearly unrecognizable Geoffrey Rush plays a theater owner to whom Shakespeare has promised his play. Tom Wilkinson is hilarious as a moneylender with aspirations to act. Colin Firth is also quite funny as the dim-witted Earl of Wessex and the peerless Imelda Staunton wrings laughs out of her part as Viola's nurse. There is also fine supporting work from Ben Affleck perfectly pompous as star actor Ned Allyn, a fine cameo by Rupert Everett as rival Christopher Marlowe and the singular Judi Dench in regal splendor as Queen Elizabeth. In the leading roles of Shakespeare and Viola, Joseph Fiennes and Gwyneth Paltrow strike sparks. As she has previously demonstrated, Paltrow can produce a flawless British accent and here manages to convince as a forward-thinking woman more interested in poetry and true love than an arranged marriage. The real find of the film, however, is Fiennes. With his limpid eyes, striking features and lilting voice, he perfectly captures the tortured soul of an artist and lover. While he is on the cusp of a career (and is often currently mentioned in tandem with his older brother Ralph), it should not be long before he is a star in his own right. So, if you're in the mood for a richly rewarding evening at the movies, think about taking in SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE. If you are already familiar with the Bard's work, your enjoyment will be increased, but you needn't know much about his plays to savor this delectable film. Rating: B+ MPAA Rating: R for sexuality Running time: 123 mins. |
| © 2005 by C. E. Murphy. All Rights Reserved. |