
| O Brother, Where Art Thou? |
In Preston Sturges' great Sullivan's Travels (1942), the movie director John L. Sullivan wants to make his magnum opus, a document that holds a mirror up to life and displays not only dignity but "a true canvas of the suffering of humanity." He plans to call the film O Brother, Where Art Thou? Now in a tribute to Sturges, the Coen brothers -- Ethan and Joel -- have made a film that partially pays homage to Sturges, other films of the 1930s, but with a decidedly modern twist. Despite its highfalutin' pedigree (the screenplay is an adaptation of Homer's epic Odyssey), this motion picture comes off as a modest entry into the filmmaking siblings' oeuvre. While one might argue that the Coen brothers depict the dignity of their leading characters, O Brother, Where Art Thou? doesn't exactly realize the lofty dreams of Sturges' fictitious filmmaker. It more or less is a pastiche, an entertainment to be enjoyed for its own modest sake. The Coens, however, should be cited for doing their homework and managing to find early 20th-century equivalents for the mythic story. Odysseus and his men are represented by three escapees from a 1930s chain gang making their way in pursuit of buried treasure: the dandy Everett Ulysses McGill (George Clooney), the dimwitted Pete (John Turturro) and the even denser Delmar (Tim Blake Nelson). Once the trio escapes, they run into a blind Black man who helps them (the seer), attempt to find respite with Pete's relatives (representative of the lotus eaters), meet a trio of luscious women (the Sirens), cross paths with a one-eyed bible salesman (standing in for the Cyclops), are led astray by bank robber George Nelson (analogous to the sojourn on AEolus), stumble upon a Ku Klux Klan rally (the Laestrygonians), and fac a contemporary Scylla and Charybdis when they are recognized as escapees at a political gathering with no visible means of escape. As in Raising Arizona, the Coen brothers establish a comic tone that borders perilously close to a cartoon. If it weren't for the mostly fine (albeit stylized) performances, the film easily could have veered into the realm of bad comedy. It also helps that the siblings have intermingled 1930s American mythology with the story (i.e., the blues musician who reportedly sold his sold to the devil at a crossroads, Baby Face Nelson, etc.) and bolstered the material by employing a terrific musical score that interpolates original recordings and judicious remakes of bluegrass, country and blues. In the leading role of the smooth-talking Everett, George Clooney has been made up to resemble Clark Gable complete with pomaded hair and clipped mustache. Although the character may not be any smarter than his buddies, he has been blessed with the ability to project intelligence and Clooney captures that beautifully. His performance is nicely modulated and very amusing, recalling the screwball work of William Powell and Cary Grant. Finally allowed to cut loose on screen for the first time, Clooney rises to the challenge and fills the screen with his own brand of movie-star charisma. John Turturro tends to overplay the stupidity of his character which robs the role of some of comic potential, although he gets some mileage out of his shtick in the film's early sequences. Far better is actor-director Tim Blake Nelson who is perfectly cast as the dull-witted Delmar. Perhaps because he is not a familiar face, Nelson is completely believable as the bumbling rube. Of the large supporting cast, Charles Durning as a corrupt politician, John Goodman as the bible salesman and Michael Badalucco as bank robber George Nelson (don't call him 'Baby Face') stand out, while Holly Hunter is miscast as Penny, a harried mother of seven who proves less constant than her literary counterpart. Roger Deakins does his usual best as cinematographer, capturing the Southern landscapes with his camera and investing the film with its mythic patina. Director Joel Coen pushes the envelope as much as possible, none more so than by staging the Klan rally as a Busby Berkeley musical number. It is a moment that is a bit uncomfortable to watch, which may have been the filmmaker's intent. Nevertheless, it does border on questionable taste. Ultimately that scene sums up what is both right and wrong with O Brother, Where Art Thou? In their other films, the Coen brothers have tread a fine line between a condescending attitude (that's what ruined Fargo for me) and a deep affection for their characters. In this film, that line is blurred and it leaves the audience confused as to where their sympathies should lie. Despite the valiant effort by Clooney, O Brother, Where Art Thou? ranks as one of the lesser efforts by the brothers Coen. Rating: C+ |
| © 2006 by C. E. Murphy. All Rights Reserved. |