
| Hilary and Jackie |
There's something about the story of a person tragically cut down by a fatal disease that makes screenwriters and directors salivate and often (though not always) the result is a crowd-pleaser. Whether it is strictly a romance (DARK VICTORY, LOVE STORY), a family comedy- drama (TERMS OF ENDEARMENT, STEPMOM) or a sports story (PRIDE OF THE YANKEES, BRIAN'S SONG), the more of a tear-jerker the better. The life of cellist Jacqueline du Pré, who suffered with multiple sclerosis, has already served as the basis for 1986's fictionalized DUET FOR ONE, which starred Julie Andrews as a violinist stricken with a crippling disorder. The film itself was sub par although Andrews rose above the material and made you care. Now, screenwriter Frank Cottrell Boyce and documentarian-turned-feature filmmaker Anand Tucker have adapted the memoir A GENIUS IN THE FAMILY by du Pré's sister and brother into a fascinating, if somewhat problematic biopic HILARY AND JACKIE. In her native England, Jacqueline du Pré has all but been canonized by the music establishment and there has been an outcry over this film. Her former husband, the Argentine pianist and conductor Daniel Barenboim, refused his cooperation as well as the rights to many of du Pré's recordings (although her signature piece, Elgar's "Concerto for Violincello and Orchestra in E Minor, op.85" is on the soundtrack) and he has taken the unusual step of commissioning a biography written by an author of his choosing. There has also been an outcry from people who "knew" du Pré, mostly over the way she is portrayed in the film. Since HILARY AND JACKIE is itself based on a published biography jointly written by her sister and brother, the brouhaha appears amusing to a distant observer. I won't even claim to know whether Tucker's version is "true" or not. Judging it on its merit as a film biography, HILARY AND JACKIE ranks as a slightly above average entry in that category. Boyce and Tucker have not so much made a film as composed one, clearly playing on the idea of variations on a theme. We first meet the title characters as young girls playing at the shore and in swift strokes, their bond is clearly detailed. They can almost communicate telepathically, not unlike twins. Both girls are encouraged in their musical studies by their parents, particularly their mother (played by Celia Imrie). Brother Piers, although a co-author of the source material is relegated to no more than a brief walk-on in the film. His function as a youngster seemed to be to serve as an antenna for the television! The girls, however, are front and center. Hilary plays the flute and appears to be the one headed for glory and a life of performing. She applies herself wholeheartedly to practicing and studying her instrument. Jackie is more mercurial, and must struggle for attention in Hilary's shadow. As they age, though, Jackie pulls ahead in terms of ability and soon their roles are reversed. In keeping with the musical motif, the film is divided into section. The first focuses on the girls as children and culminates in a contest in which both won in their respective divisions. Skipping ahead in years, the focus is on Hilary as she struggles with her musical training and following along in her sister's wake. Hilary attracts a suitor, Christopher 'Kiffer' Finzi, whom she agrees to marry. The film then backtracks and, offering a variation on the theme, tells similar events from Jackie's point of view. We see her frustrations and her growing eccentricities. Given a priceless cello which du Pre comes to feel is an albatross, she often deliberately tries to ruin it by exposing it to extreme cold or leaving it in the sunlight. Like her talent, though, the instrument will not be destroyed. After she brings home Barenboim to introduce him to the family, we see her wedding. Out of the blue one day, she arrives at Hilary's home in the country and proceeds to act strangely. The most outrageous request is that she wants to sleep with Finzi! More outrageously, Hilary allows it. This is the part of the story that has attracted the most criticism in the United Kingdom, but Hilary du Pré Finzi claims it to be true and even her children back up the story. Shortly thereafter, Jackie begins to show signs of fatigue and muscle failure and is diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. What makes this film a cut above the usual are the strong performances from the two actresses in the titular roles. When she burst on the scene a few short years ago in her Oscar-nominated turn in BREAKING THE WAVES, Emily Watson proved her facility for playing characters on the edge. As Jacqueline du Pré, she perfectly captures the unruly, slightly spoiled quality of a star musician but also shows the pain and fear that drives the ego as well. Hers is a galvanic portrayal—one that teeters on the border of being just too much, but Watson is skilled enough not to go over the top. As she has the showier role, she has also been heaping the lion's share of praise which is a gross injustice to her co-star Rachel Griffiths. An Australian by birth, Griffiths first caught attention for her supporting roles in MURIEL'S WEDDING and JUDE. While not as beautiful as Watson, this actress is her equal as far as ability and provides HILARY AND JACKIE with its anchor. She and Watson play marvelously off one another and one easily accepts them as sisters. Griffiths also makes the audience almost understand how Hilary could allow — indeed encourage — her husband to sleep with her sister. The supporting roles are also well-cast. Charles Dance does well as the patriarch of the du Pré family while Celia Imrie strikes the right notes as the matriarch. James Frain, so good in ELIZABETH does what he can with the role of Barenboim, but he is hamstrung by the script which treads lightly over his affairs and his reputation as a taskmaster. More successful is David Morrisey who brings a sexy charisma to the role of Kiffer Finzi. While the story of Jacqueline du Pré can be read as another in the line of stories of troubled geniuses who suffer for their art, Cottrell Boyce's screenplay and Tucker's direction attempt to move it into a more universal realm. By focusing on the relationship between the sisters and in the acting of Watson and Griffiths, they have fashioned a chamber piece. While its tune may not be for everyone's ears, anyone who is interested in classical music, familial relationships or a art films should not be disappointed. Rating: B |
| © 2007 by C. E. Murphy. All Rights Reserved. |