
| Crime + Punishment in Suburbia |
What hath Clueless wrought? Following on the heels of that film's success, which wittily transposed Jane Austen's classic Emma to a Beverly Hills high school, filmgoers were subjected to a string of reinterpretations of classic literature set among the Gen-Y set: Pygmalion became She's All That and Cyrano de Bergerac morphed into Whatever It Takes. Even Shakespeare was not immune: The Taming of the Shrew was reinterpreted as 10 Things I Hate About You while Ethan Hawke depicted a slightly older slacker version of Hamlet as well as Pip in a modern-day Great Expectations. And there's more to come (Thomas Hardy's The Mayor of Castorbridge has be re-imagined in the American West in the upcoming The Claim, just to name one example.) Don't misunderstand; I think that on occasion this can be an intriguing proposition. But turning great works of art into teen movie fodder is questionable at best. Also, it should be no surprise that scenarists are turning to books more readily found on a college reading list rather than seeking to craft a new idea. After all, there's a ready-made plot structure, strong characters and (often) great dialogue. Plus, the original author is dead so there are no royalties and more importantly, no complaints. Having seeming plundered from every conceivable writer, it was only a matter of time before someone got to Russian literature. That someone was Larry Gross who has "adapted" Dostoyevsky's seminal Crime and Punishment by switching the location to modern-day Southern California and the sex of the main character from male to female. Crime + Punishment in Suburbia, which debuted at the Sundance Film Festival, centers on Roseanne Skolnick (Monica Keena), the most popular girl in her high school. She seemingly has it all, including a football player boyfriend (James DeBello). Yet beneath the surface, things aren't all that perfect. Her stepfather (Michael Ironside) is having trouble adjusting to his new job and drinks excessively. Her mother (Ellen Barkin) seeks solace from her unhappy marriage by going out with her friend (Conchetta Ferrell). Roseanne also has her very own stalker, albeit a photographic one -- a loner named Vincent (Vincent Kartheiser) who is determined to "save" Roseanne. The relatively brief film (it runs 100 minutes), is divided into seven "chapters" with provocative titles like "II. Her Mother's a Whore" and "VII. Guilt Destroys". Director Rob Schmidt (whose previous film was Saturn), however, succumbs to the sophomore curse. Although he demonstrates an ability to create occasionally entrancing visuals, the helmer has a tendency to overdo it. Several key moments are awkwardly staged (including an integral plot point). To be fair, Gross' screenplay doesn't help either. The intention appears to have been to create a satirical look at life in the suburbs but American Beauty arguably got there first. Whether intentional or not, Crime + Punishment in Suburbia plays like a retread. It doesn't help that both films feature a young man with an interest in photography who is obsessed with a female classmate. Where Wes Bentley was creepily seductive in American Beauty, Vincent Kartheiser comes across as just plain eerie. His androgynous looks play against the character; he recounts how he was a juvenile delinquent who more or less found some salvation in believing in God, but none of what he says is believable, although whether any actor could have pulled it off is arguable. Monica Keena has her moments but her performance is also uneven. In some scenes, she barely registers: Keena drops her voice almost to a whisper and recites her lines in a muted voice. As fans of the TV show "Dawson's Creek" know, when given the right material, this young actress can soar but here she merely is flapping her wings. Of the younger players, only James DeBello manages to impress as Roseanne's dimwitted jock boyfriend. The adults don't fare much better either. When fine performers like Ellen Barkin, Conchetta Ferrell, Lucinda Jenny and Jeffrey Wright barely register on screen, there is clearly something wrong. Only Michael Ironside as Fred Skolnick, Roseanne's drunken, loutish stepfather, manages to rise above the material to limn a portrait of a proud man driven by anger. Ironside attempts to inject shadings into a character that in lesser hands would be a stock villain. There was an intriguing idea behind Crime + Punishment in Suburbia but the script failed to adopt the philosophical bent of the original novel (undoubtedly deemed too heavy for the film's target audience), the direction is haphazard and uneven, and the performers were left floundering. Except for a terrific soundtrack -- and points have to be given to Schmidt for finding songs that comment on the action unfolding in the scenes -- there's little to recommend. Rating: C- |
| © 2007 by C. E. Murphy. All Rights Reserved. |