
| The Affair of the Necklace |
Admittedly, I'm a big fan of period pieces. No matter what the historical epoch being depicted, I can usually find something to like in the film. That said, I will have to confess that it was very difficult to achieve that goal while watching The Affair of the Necklace, directed by Charles Shyer and written by John Sweet. In the years just prior to the outbreak of the French Revolution, the Comtesse de la Motte concocted an elaborate confidence plot in order to get her hands on a magnificent diamond necklace. She developed a scheme to obtain the jewelry by duping Cardinal Rohan, a man of the cloth with questionable values who had fallen out of favor with the French royal family. Promising the Cardinal that she could help mend the riff between him and Queen Marie Antoinette, the Comtesse de la Motte, along with her husband and a member of their household, Reteaux de Villette, crafted a series of forged letters from Marie Antoinette to Rohan and even arranged a meeting between the two (using an impostor as a stand-in for the queen). At this meeting, the "queen" made it known to the cardinal that she desired the diamond necklace and he in turn acquired it and turned it over to the Comtesse to deliver it to the queen. The Comte de la Motte fled to London with the necklace where he sold off various parts of it for the cash. Before his wife could join him, though, the matter was made public. Rohan was arrested and tried by parlement, but acquitted. Jeanne de la Motte was convicted and was punished before she eventually made her way to England. Because the cardinal was cleared, the frivolous and extravagant Marie Antoinette (already disliked by her subjects because of her Austrian heritage) was implicated in the affair. The whole matter was a prelude to the French Revolution which resulted in the execution of both Marie Antoinette and her husband Louis XVI. While this incident is well-known in France, it isn't to an American audience (which barely knows its own history). So screenwriter John Sweet felt compelled to make changes in the story to make it more "dramatic." In his version, Jeanne de la Motte (Hilary Swank) isn't so much a charlatan and a cunning adventuress but a wronged woman who witnessed the murder of her father and the confiscation of her home. All she wants to do is restore the dignity to her family name. To accomplish her goal, she allies herself with the gigolo Reteaux (Simon Baker) who also has familial issues. Together they form a plan to dupe the oily Cardinal Rohan (Jonathan Pryce) into acquiring the diamond necklace. If part of their plan involves the haughty Marie Antoinette (Joely Richardson), then so be it. Sweet's script follows the contours of the story but the details are changed so much that the tale become more and more fictionalized. It doesn't help that the filmmakers have opted to have a somewhat minor character of the Royal House Minister (Brian Cox) serve as narrator of the story; it further removes the audience from any identification with the main characters. Of course, it's dicey to build a film around a relatively unlikable person -- but it can be done. Sweet and director Shyer, however, have tried to turn Jeanne into a heroine and therein lies part of the problem. The historical figure is anything but. As portrayed by a badly miscast Hilary Swank, this Jeanne is a wounded bird out for vengeance. It's easy to see why the role may have held appeal for the actress -- a chance to demonstrate that her Oscar-winning performance in Boys Don't Cry wasn't a fluke in a big costume epic. Swank looks intriguing in the period costumes (nicely designed by Academy Award winner Milena Canonero), but she has been coached to employ a quasi-British accent. (Indeed, Shyer has [mis]cast a motley crew of British, Australian and American actors in this distinctly French story.) Swank gamely tries to maintain a fully-rounded characterization, but her speech wobbles and she doesn't always seem able to plumb the dramatic depths required. Instead of a commanding figure, she appears to be a girl playing dress up. Of course, the script and direction offer her (or anyone in the cast) no support. It's doubtful any actress could have pulled off the role as written. The Affair of the Necklace had the potential to be a fascinating portrait of a 18th-century con artist. Instead, it takes a fascinating footnote and reduces it to a mediocre and fitfully entertaining film. Rating: C- MPAA Rating: R for some sexuality Running time: 118 mins. |
| © 2008 by C. E. Murphy. All Rights Reserved. |